Refresh the source
We ingest the official OIG file and record the run: totals, additions, removals, and the file's own last-modified date.
The OIG publishes the exclusion list as a free file. Anyone can search it. What survives an audit is not a search — it is a dated record showing every roster member was screened against every list, every month, and what the result was.
THE OBLIGATION
Exclusions are added continuously. Someone clear at hire in March can be excluded in June, and the claims you submit for their work in July carry the exposure. That is why the guidance is monthly re-screening of the active roster, not a one-off check at onboarding.
The penalty structure is what makes this urgent rather than administrative: repayment of amounts paid, plus civil monetary penalties that can accrue per claim submitted by or for an excluded person.
THE ARTIFACT
A screenshot of a government search box proves nothing about last month. The deliverable is a document covering the whole roster: who was screened, against which list, on what date, with what result, and what was done about every hit.
ExcludeRadar keeps that record as a by-product of doing the work. Each screening is stored with its date, its lane, its match basis, and the state of the source file at the time — including which lists were not covered, so the document does not overstate itself.
HOW IT RUNS
We ingest the official OIG file and record the run: totals, additions, removals, and the file's own last-modified date.
New exclusions are matched against everyone you are monitoring, so a hit surfaces the day it appears.
By NPI where one exists. Names route to the assisted lane with the match basis shown on every candidate.
Every result is dated and retained. The monthly report is assembled from records, not regenerated from a fresh search.
QUESTIONS BUYERS ACTUALLY ASK
The OIG publishes monthly. We check daily and record every run, so the evidence shows both when the source file changed and when we last verified it.
We check the source daily, but we are not going to claim cadence as our advantage — at least one incumbent scans hourly. What we do that they do not is screen the counterparty as well as the person.
The OIG LEIE, and nothing else. Not SAM.gov, not State Medicaid lists, not licensure, not OFAC. Every clear result says so, because a clear result that overstates its scope is worse than no result.
Yes. The MCP server exposes read-only screening and coverage tools, and every page returns Markdown when asked. See the agent guide.
RECOMMENDED PLAN · AGENCY
Run a counterparty check free, then put your roster on a screening cadence that produces the evidence.